Should anonymity (not using real name) be protected in electronic interactions and communications? Would this be a good thing for community, responsibility, free expression, political participation, and personal fulfillment? If so, when and why?
Anonymity should be protected in certain electronic interactions and communications because while the anonymity can be a good way to protect yourself or someone who means no harm, it can protect flames, bad people, and criminals.
Anonymity can help people express themselves freely on blog or site where your opinion matters. As long as the chatting stays friendly , anonymity is not a bad thing at all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(45)
-
▼
October
(17)
- Question of the Day: 10/31 Initiative
- Question of the Day: 10/27 Smart Phones
- Question of the Day: 10/26 Life Long Purpose
- Question of the Day: 10/26 Life Long Purpose
- Question of the Day: 10/25 Cell Phone Distractions
- Question of the Day: 10/21 My Tablet
- Question of the Day: 10/24 Portable devices
- Question of the Day: 10/17 Make-Up Monday
- What did I do or learn today?
- Question of the Day: 10/12 Anonymity
- Question of the Day: 10/7 Internet Meanie
- Question of the Day: 10/10 Presonal Credo
- Question of the Day: 10/11 Youth Hackers
- Netiquette project
- Question of the Day: 10/6 Steve Jobs
- Question of the Day: 10/4 HSPA Graduation?
- Question of the Day: 10/3 Computerized HSPA?
-
▼
October
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment